Webb3 TA 2.3 - PR19 Assurance Framework Navigation: TA 2.3 – PR19 Assurance Framework Purpose: This annex contains the Southern Water Services PR19 Assurance Framework (Assurance Framework). The Assurance Framework is the approach we have taken to assuring the quality of the business plan. Webb13 feb. 2024 · PR19 initial assessment of plans: historical expenditure, companies’ forecasts and Ofwat’s challenge Technical appendix 3: Aligning risk and return …
CMA narrows gap with Ofwat on cost of capital - Utility Week
WebbResponse to Ofwat’s PR19 Draft Determination for Thames Water Appendix . TW-DD-A12 . Outcomes . ... Measure Ofwat DD 2024/25 target Proposed Business Plan Scenario 2024/25 target Glide path to 2024/25 ODI penalty ... - which is 6.66 l/p/day less than the endAMP7 value as per Ofwat's IAP - of our April Plan (see Table 2). PR19 TW-DD … Webb22 juli 2024 · Letter to South Staffs Water re repayment of intercompany loan. 22 July 2024. PR19 Draft Determinations: Bristol Water - Aligning risk and return actions and interventions. 18 July 2024. PR19 draft determinations: Affinity Water - Accounting for past delivery appendix. 18 July 2024. PR19 draft determinations: Portsmouth Water - … browns partsmaster inc
Business plan 2024-2025 - SWW
WebbAs part of our 2024 price review (PR19) methodology, we introduced Direct Procurement for Customers (DPC). We set out that we expected water company business plans to consider DPC where this was likely to deliver the greatest value for customers. DPC promotes innovation and resilience by allowing new participants to WebbFive water companies initially submitted infrastructure projects to be undertaken via Direct Procurement for Customers in their PR19 business plans. These developments suggest that it is inevitable that more projects will be delivered through competitive processes, rather than under traditional regulatory frameworks. WebbPR19 Business Plan: Response to IAP 6 2 Ofwat’s growth models We have concerns over Ofwat’s approach to assessing the relative efficiency of growth expenditure given the significant magnitudes involved and the potential for inequitable results. We also have significant reservations about the different results of the models used. browns park swinging bridge